-
Exclusivity Isn’t Enough: Northern District Of California Dismisses Luxury Retail Tying Claims
09/23/2025On September 17, 2025, Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a putative antitrust class action, holding that plaintiffs failed to state a plausible Sherman Act claim, dismissing all federal antitrust claims with prejudice, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ state law claims in the absence of any remaining basis for federal jurisdiction. Cavalleri v. Hermès International, No. 24-cv-01707-JD (N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2025).
-
New York State Court Finds Violation Of Donnelly Act Stemming From Ski Area Acquisition
03/18/2025On February 26, 2025, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Onondaga, rendered a decision involving an alleged anticompetitive acquisition under New York’s Donnelly Act. This decision demonstrates the importance of considering whether a contemplated acquisition may be scrutinized by state antitrust enforcers. People v. Intermountain Mgmt., Inc., Index No. 008588/2022 (Sup. Ct, Onondaga Cty. 2025).